Translate
Showing posts with label attorney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label attorney. Show all posts
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Improper dosage of prozac leads to murderous behaviour
A couple of years ago, Alyssa Bustamante was just another misunderstood teen with a defiant glaze and a goth look. Now recently turned 18, she's serving a life sentence in jail after found guilty for the murder of nine years old Elizabeth Olten.
But what could have lead to such horrible violent act from this apparently normal teen from Missouri?
Is Alyssa Bustamante a monster in disguise or could it be that her acts were strongly influenced by the negative effects of the a high dosage of antidepressants?
A boy in Canada , although experimenting with various drugs at the early age of 15, had reportedly no violent tendencies killed his friend with a kitchen knife. Those who knew him said his personality changed radically after being prescribed Prozac. Even the judge presiding his case stated that drugs such as Prozac and other antidepressants may have extremely negative effects on teen, that often lead to violence towards themselves or others.
In UK, a boy under 18 beat his father to death after taking high doses of Prozac and citalopram, a drug that was illegal for patients under the legal age. In Germany Tim Kretschmer opened fire on his classmates without saying a word, just like it was in a video game. It's clear he couldn't have been lucid at the moment, but could his brain be altered by medication in such a way he was unable to realize what was happening?
The fact that drugs are killing teenagers all over the world may sound almost like a cliché, something wide accepted as a downsize of our modern world, something we don't really want to hear about until it happens in our neighborhood. But these are not the generic illegal drugs sold on on a back alley, these are legal drugs , prescribed by doctors for patients who are trying to overcome their problems.
Prozac side-effects have created news about suicidal teens and shocking brutal murders, but should we blame the pharmaceutical companies or the doctors for giving wrong prescriptions?
The theory that pharmaceuticals companies such as Eli Lilly purposely hid informations from the public about their products, information that pointed to some test results showing how antidepressants increase suicidal tendency, by causing an imbalance in the brain's biochemicals was regarded as a conspiracy theory, and yet , we are bombarded by the news with more and more tragic stories.
We can't help but wondering if these gruesome crimes could have been avoided if companies would have been a little bit more transparent, if doctors would have treated their jobs with a little bit more responsibility and tried to find out what exactly was the problem with these troubled teens before choking them with pills.
Maybe Alyssa Bustamante would have prepared for graduating high school this year, instead of looking at us from behind bars.
Monday, June 4, 2012
Judge in Breivik case, playing cards in court.
Ernst Henning Nielsen, one of the three judges presiding the case of the mass killer from Norway was caught playing cards on his laptop while Mattias Gardell, Swedish religious historian, was addressing court.
It seems, however that the history lesson was not interesting enough for judge Ernst Henning Nielsen who decided to enjoy a game of solitaire before the lunch break.
The court's first reaction after the cameras caught this goof was to condemn the broadcasters for filming the judge's desk.
“One of the conditions for broadcasting is that there should be no filming of the judges’ desk. There are notes and documents of a sensitive nature lying there,” said Irene Ramm spokeswoman for the district court. She then came back on a more friendly note : "The judges are attentively following what is being said and what is being presented to the court. There are different ways of staying focused."
Anders Behring Breivik , age 33 is currently being judged for the attacks on July 22 2011 when he detonated a rigged car near a government building in Oslo. He then debarked on the island of Utøya where the youth division of the Norvegian Labour Party was organizing a summer camp. Breivik pretended to be a cop and then opened fire killing 69 persons. A total of 77 persons were killed and another 242 were wounded on that tragic day by a man that claims to be leading a holy crusade against multiculturalism and "The muslim invasion" .
Breivik's intolerance towards muslims may have roots in his early years when he apparently had some problems with some members of the muslim community in his hometown. At 7, his friend's father, Turkish, wrecked his bicycle and at 15 he had a minor altercation with a Pakistani underground driver for riding on the outside of a underground car, that ended up with Breivik's being slapped.
At the moment the courthouse is trying to establish if the "crusader" is to be sent to a regular prison or an insane asylum. Breivik's has confessed his crimes and denies any responsibility, regarding himself as a hero, but ironically he managed to prove one thing right : terrorism has no religion.
Friday, May 25, 2012
FELA - protecting railroad workers since 1908
In the late 19 century and the beginning of 20th century the U.S. railroad companies thrived and expanded but the working conditions for the average Joe in this area were a bet with death. The number of deaths and injuries were of the order of thousands, and the victims may have been in the situation of waiting years for verdict in court if the railroad companies fought the decisions.
Many of them wouldn't even go to court seeking their legal compensation fearing disciplinary action and retaliation.
President Benjamin Harrison once compared the struggle and toil of a railroad worker to that of a soldier on the battlefield.
"It is a reproach to our civilization that any class of American workmen, should in the pursuit of a necessary and useful vocation, be subjected to a peril of life and limb as great as that of a soldier in time of war".
Something had to be changed. The gloomy statistics had to draw the attention of the legislation.
The Federal Employers Liability Act was passed by Congress in 1908 and it meant that railroad workers had the right to sue their employers for damages if they were injured while doing their job since they were not covered by regular workers’ compensation laws.
Ever since, FELA was a guardian for a safe working environment, even if conditions have surely changed since the late 1800. FELA also has been protecting workers from the pressure exercised by companies against those who want to seek legal consultation when they feel their rights are violated.
As an example , it's a little known fact that sometimes workers who have sustained injuries are entitled to more than just compensation since their employers will always seek to minimize their costs on the legal battlefield.
The best advice for a victim of a work accident in the railroad bussiness is to contact an experienced FELA attorney
Many of them wouldn't even go to court seeking their legal compensation fearing disciplinary action and retaliation.
President Benjamin Harrison once compared the struggle and toil of a railroad worker to that of a soldier on the battlefield.
"It is a reproach to our civilization that any class of American workmen, should in the pursuit of a necessary and useful vocation, be subjected to a peril of life and limb as great as that of a soldier in time of war".
Something had to be changed. The gloomy statistics had to draw the attention of the legislation.
The Federal Employers Liability Act was passed by Congress in 1908 and it meant that railroad workers had the right to sue their employers for damages if they were injured while doing their job since they were not covered by regular workers’ compensation laws.
Ever since, FELA was a guardian for a safe working environment, even if conditions have surely changed since the late 1800. FELA also has been protecting workers from the pressure exercised by companies against those who want to seek legal consultation when they feel their rights are violated.
As an example , it's a little known fact that sometimes workers who have sustained injuries are entitled to more than just compensation since their employers will always seek to minimize their costs on the legal battlefield.
The best advice for a victim of a work accident in the railroad bussiness is to contact an experienced FELA attorney
Labels:
attorney,
drug. lawsuit,
experience,
FELA,
job,
law,
lawyer,
railroad
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Lawyer of the day
My last article was about a car accident and today I just stumbled across an interesting article from earlier this year, the kind of article you could say restores faith to humanity.
On February 07 this year, personal injury lawyer Melinda Helbock, also founding partner of The Law Offices of Melinda J. Helbock, a well known law firm in San Diego , California, announced that she will be offering free legal advice for people affected by car accidents occurred in San Diego. This can only be seen as a good news for all drivers in San Diego who know have someone to turn to when found in unfortunate events.
Melinda Helbock has proven herself as an excellent attorney in her over 17 years of trial experience. Member of he San Diego Bar Association and the American Association of Justice, she received her law degree at the California Western School of Law, and quickly became known through the community for her dedication and kindness in helping people who have entered her office.
Indeed, the warm, family atmosphere at Melinda J. Helbock, A.P.C is not what you would usually see in a law firm and the trained staff as well as the collaboration with a whole network of law specialists throughout the country has helped it provide high quality legal service for nearly 20 years.
Melinda J. Helbock, A.P.C covers areas of practice such as:
But Melinda is not only a great lawyer. Loving wife and mother of two boys, she is also a very active member of community. You might wonder how does she manages to get all these things done ? Yet she is constantly volunteering for organizations like :
On February 07 this year, personal injury lawyer Melinda Helbock, also founding partner of The Law Offices of Melinda J. Helbock, a well known law firm in San Diego , California, announced that she will be offering free legal advice for people affected by car accidents occurred in San Diego. This can only be seen as a good news for all drivers in San Diego who know have someone to turn to when found in unfortunate events.
Melinda Helbock has proven herself as an excellent attorney in her over 17 years of trial experience. Member of he San Diego Bar Association and the American Association of Justice, she received her law degree at the California Western School of Law, and quickly became known through the community for her dedication and kindness in helping people who have entered her office.
Indeed, the warm, family atmosphere at Melinda J. Helbock, A.P.C is not what you would usually see in a law firm and the trained staff as well as the collaboration with a whole network of law specialists throughout the country has helped it provide high quality legal service for nearly 20 years.
Melinda J. Helbock, A.P.C covers areas of practice such as:
- -Civil Litigation
- -Business Litigation
- -Corporate Law
- -Personal Injury
- -Asbestos Litigation
- -Pharmaceutical Litigation
- -Real Estate Law
- -Worker's Compensation
- -Entertainment Law
- -Pro-Bono Representation
- -Employment Law
- -Intellectual Property Law
- -Bankruptcy Law
- -Family Law
- -Probate Law
- -Wills & Estates
But Melinda is not only a great lawyer. Loving wife and mother of two boys, she is also a very active member of community. You might wonder how does she manages to get all these things done ? Yet she is constantly volunteering for organizations like :
- Encinitas County Day, volunteer
- Alzheimer's patient, volunteer caregiver
- ELL Minor B's Nationals 2010, team mom
- ELL Rookies Grasshoppers 2010, co-team mom
- Encinitas Little League Rookies Sidewinders 2009, team mom
Monday, May 14, 2012
Paper cup stops truck
A community was appalled last week in Texas, after truck driver
Richard Bolduc was involved in a very unlikely truck accident.
Richard was driving at approximately at 62 mph on U.S. 271 near Bogota, TX, hauling shingles from Shreveport when an object shattered his windshield rendering him practically blind from the explosion. As Richard declared his first thought was that his phone exploded but luckily, he managed to stop the truck in time, avoiding a potential collision in traffic.
It seems that the mysterious object was nothing more than a plain paper medium sized soda cup from Burger King, thrown out the window by of an oncoming car.
State trooper Ryan Case who responded to the scene said that he found the paper cup , but threw it in the ditch as he did not believe it could have any correlation with accident. He then found pieces from it scattered around the impact area.
It does seem unlikely that such a harmless object as a paper cup could provoke that amount of damage to a truck. We are not talking about cracking a windshield , we are talking about going through it with such a force it made shattered it. Can a paper cup do that?
I did some research on the internet and discovered how this question was already given an answer by the Myth Busters two years ago in one of their episodes. If you want to see for yourself here is the link :
http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbusters-soda-cup-killer-angle-2.html
Driver Richard Bolduc is currently recovering after sustaining serious injuries to his face, eyes and back. Fortunately, even though a specialist had to recover paper fragments from his eyes he is not in danger of blinding. Bolduc live as far as 600 miles from where the accident happened, however, the community was more than helpful. Bolduc is currently staying with pastor Donnie Childer, former truck driver himself and his wife Dana. They took care of Bolduc and his truck and also drove him to hospital after they were called in by driver Mitch Cannon who was behind Richard when the accident happened.
The Childers also made sure to call Richard's wife and let her about her husbands situation and that he is OK. Jennifer Balduc, mother of two girls with special needs declared that it would have been extremely hard without the help of the friendly people in Bogota. Even though doctors can say at the moment if Richard is going to be able to drive again, Jennifer is just happy that her husband is alive.
Now that is a heart warming story about kindness and how there are still people out there ready to jump and give a helping hand to their fellows in need, but it could also be looked as an alarm call for drivers everywhere to be more responsible on the road. It this case a simple gesture as throwing a paper cup out the window could have cost a man's life and maybe even lead to a traffic collision increasing the number of victims. Each year truck accidents alone clai 5000 lives in US. Maybe is time to raise awareness,because everyone knows accidents are best to be avoided than dealt with.
In the unfortunate case of a truck accident or any type of car accident whatsoever it's best to remember that you can seek compensation. A consultation with a truck accident lawyer may help you.
Richard was driving at approximately at 62 mph on U.S. 271 near Bogota, TX, hauling shingles from Shreveport when an object shattered his windshield rendering him practically blind from the explosion. As Richard declared his first thought was that his phone exploded but luckily, he managed to stop the truck in time, avoiding a potential collision in traffic.
It seems that the mysterious object was nothing more than a plain paper medium sized soda cup from Burger King, thrown out the window by of an oncoming car.
State trooper Ryan Case who responded to the scene said that he found the paper cup , but threw it in the ditch as he did not believe it could have any correlation with accident. He then found pieces from it scattered around the impact area.
It does seem unlikely that such a harmless object as a paper cup could provoke that amount of damage to a truck. We are not talking about cracking a windshield , we are talking about going through it with such a force it made shattered it. Can a paper cup do that?
I did some research on the internet and discovered how this question was already given an answer by the Myth Busters two years ago in one of their episodes. If you want to see for yourself here is the link :
http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbusters-soda-cup-killer-angle-2.html
Driver Richard Bolduc is currently recovering after sustaining serious injuries to his face, eyes and back. Fortunately, even though a specialist had to recover paper fragments from his eyes he is not in danger of blinding. Bolduc live as far as 600 miles from where the accident happened, however, the community was more than helpful. Bolduc is currently staying with pastor Donnie Childer, former truck driver himself and his wife Dana. They took care of Bolduc and his truck and also drove him to hospital after they were called in by driver Mitch Cannon who was behind Richard when the accident happened.
The Childers also made sure to call Richard's wife and let her about her husbands situation and that he is OK. Jennifer Balduc, mother of two girls with special needs declared that it would have been extremely hard without the help of the friendly people in Bogota. Even though doctors can say at the moment if Richard is going to be able to drive again, Jennifer is just happy that her husband is alive.
Now that is a heart warming story about kindness and how there are still people out there ready to jump and give a helping hand to their fellows in need, but it could also be looked as an alarm call for drivers everywhere to be more responsible on the road. It this case a simple gesture as throwing a paper cup out the window could have cost a man's life and maybe even lead to a traffic collision increasing the number of victims. Each year truck accidents alone clai 5000 lives in US. Maybe is time to raise awareness,because everyone knows accidents are best to be avoided than dealt with.
In the unfortunate case of a truck accident or any type of car accident whatsoever it's best to remember that you can seek compensation. A consultation with a truck accident lawyer may help you.
Monday, May 7, 2012
Pradaxa Injury - Boehringer Ingelheim plays dumb
This month it seems I've written a lot about medical problems and medical lawsuits. And now I find myself writing about another miracle drug that has been proved to do more harm than good in a lot of cases. Before that though , I must clarify that I am not under no circumstance advertising these pharmaceutical products ,nor am I trying to give them a bad name. A lot of people have been taking them and it improved their condition, but however there is still a great number of patients who have been complaining of some serious side-effects. Side-effects that in some cases put their life in danger.
Pradaxa is an anticoagulant mainly used for treating pacients with atrial fibrillation, a heart condition that leads to abnormal heart beats. Without treating, atrial fibrillation could lead to blood clots and strokes so an anticoagulant drug could mean the difference between life and death for those unfortunate to have this condition.
Pradaxa was released in 2010 , brought on the market by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals and it quickly gain popularity over its predecesor and competitior, Warfarin, mainly for being more user-friendly as the patient does not need to do regular blood test or have any food restrictions.
However, the magic did not last long after it have been reported that Pradaxa may have some fatal side-effects as severe bleeding injuries were in patients who were taking Pradaxa, injuries that sometime lead to death. FDA was flooded with reports of victims suffering from internal bleedings after using the anticoagulant drug and by the second quarter of 2011, the number of deaths sky-rocketed to 117.
Symptomes included:
Keep in mind that the FDA approved Pradaxa in October 2010 and here we are, less than a year later , 117 people died.
Despite this, Boehringer Ingelheim, the pharmaceutical company responsible for Pradaxa , dabigatran by its chemical name, indirectly dismissed any accusation, by saying that Pradaxa is as safe as any anticoagulant drug on the market and the risk it's similar for any other blood thinner. I must admit, I'm not a doctor,or a pharmacist, but seeing as Pradaxa's popularity was mainly based on the "user-friendly" part I'm a little confused of how this drug has the same potential risk of its competitors that require some serious medical tests before administering. But like I said, I'm not an expert.
To make things worse, while other blood thinners drugs had an antidote, Pradaxa had no such thing even though this thing was actually marketed as a good thing. The logic? Pradaxa is better , more efficient and also easier to use.
And things go further . This year, in January, a study conducted by researchers at the Cleveland Clinic and involving 30514 patients proved that the use of Pradaxa lead to a 33 percent higher risk of heart attack.
Wasn't Pradaxa supposed to do just the opposite?
So, where's Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals reaction? I guess as a cynical guy that I am the only thing I could do is point out the fact that maybe, striking deals with the victims cost a lot less than retreating the product of the market.
If what lead you to this article was the fact that you or someone you know dealt with some serious problem because of Pradaxa the only thing I could recommend you is to seek the advice of a Pradaxa injury lawyer
Pradaxa is an anticoagulant mainly used for treating pacients with atrial fibrillation, a heart condition that leads to abnormal heart beats. Without treating, atrial fibrillation could lead to blood clots and strokes so an anticoagulant drug could mean the difference between life and death for those unfortunate to have this condition.
Pradaxa was released in 2010 , brought on the market by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals and it quickly gain popularity over its predecesor and competitior, Warfarin, mainly for being more user-friendly as the patient does not need to do regular blood test or have any food restrictions.
However, the magic did not last long after it have been reported that Pradaxa may have some fatal side-effects as severe bleeding injuries were in patients who were taking Pradaxa, injuries that sometime lead to death. FDA was flooded with reports of victims suffering from internal bleedings after using the anticoagulant drug and by the second quarter of 2011, the number of deaths sky-rocketed to 117.
Symptomes included:
• Severe headaches
• Repeated nosebleeds
• Constant fatigue
• Weakening or swelling in the body’s joints, arms, hands, legs, ankles or feet
• Feeling dizzy
• Unusual bruises or bleeding, particularly in the gums
• Vomiting blood
• Coughing up blood
• Menstrual or vaginal bleeding that is heavier than normal
• Repeated nosebleeds
• Constant fatigue
• Weakening or swelling in the body’s joints, arms, hands, legs, ankles or feet
• Feeling dizzy
• Unusual bruises or bleeding, particularly in the gums
• Vomiting blood
• Coughing up blood
• Menstrual or vaginal bleeding that is heavier than normal
Despite this, Boehringer Ingelheim, the pharmaceutical company responsible for Pradaxa , dabigatran by its chemical name, indirectly dismissed any accusation, by saying that Pradaxa is as safe as any anticoagulant drug on the market and the risk it's similar for any other blood thinner. I must admit, I'm not a doctor,or a pharmacist, but seeing as Pradaxa's popularity was mainly based on the "user-friendly" part I'm a little confused of how this drug has the same potential risk of its competitors that require some serious medical tests before administering. But like I said, I'm not an expert.
To make things worse, while other blood thinners drugs had an antidote, Pradaxa had no such thing even though this thing was actually marketed as a good thing. The logic? Pradaxa is better , more efficient and also easier to use.
And things go further . This year, in January, a study conducted by researchers at the Cleveland Clinic and involving 30514 patients proved that the use of Pradaxa lead to a 33 percent higher risk of heart attack.
Wasn't Pradaxa supposed to do just the opposite?
So, where's Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals reaction? I guess as a cynical guy that I am the only thing I could do is point out the fact that maybe, striking deals with the victims cost a lot less than retreating the product of the market.
If what lead you to this article was the fact that you or someone you know dealt with some serious problem because of Pradaxa the only thing I could recommend you is to seek the advice of a Pradaxa injury lawyer
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



